Teal independent Monique Ryan introduced a private member’s bill on Monday that would force federal parliamentarians to disclose share trades within five business days and prohibit active trading while they hold office, mirroring United States congressional rules that Australian transparency advocates have cited for years.

Gap in current rules

Ministers must divest most listed holdings, but backbenchers and opposition MPs only declare static share registers without trade dates or values. Crikey and Open Politics analysis of post-2025 election disclosures identified more than 410 shareholdings across 228 listed entities among government members alone, with banks and miners dominating portfolios that can benefit from fiscal decisions.

Ryan’s Integrity in Parliament Investments Bill would require trades to be logged on the existing Register of Members’ Interests portal with approximate dollar bands, and would ban short-term buying and selling by the member, their spouse and dependent children. Passive index funds and superannuation defaults are exempt, targeting discretionary punts rather than retirement savings.

Chances and objections

Private members’ bills rarely pass without government support, but Ryan’s Kooyong margin gives her room to negotiate with Labor’s integrity spokespeople ahead of the next budget sitting. Nationals senator Ross Cadell has separately campaigned for trade-level disclosure, suggesting a cross-party amendment path even if the bill itself is sent to committee.

Opponents argue the compliance burden will deter professionals from entering politics and that Australia lacks evidence of insider trading in Canberra akin to US scandals. Proponents counter that absence of proof reflects absence of data, not clean markets—and that voter trust after robodebt and sports rorts requires visible rules.

Relation to other Ryan reforms

The stock-trading bill complements Ryan’s Clean Up Politics package on lobbying registers and ministerial diaries, which she pledged to reintroduce in October after 2023’s lapsed attempt. Together they frame teal crossbenchers as a governance bloc distinct from major parties’ donation reliance.

If the bill stalls, state laboratories may move first: NSW already experiments with broader interest disclosures for local councillors. Federal inaction would leave Australia as an outlier among Five Eyes partners moving toward trade transparency.

The bill would empower the Parliamentary Privileges Committee to refer suspected breaches to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, closing a loop between political disclosure and corporate market rules. Ryan’s office published the full text on its website alongside a plain-language summary for constituents.